85 résultats trouvés

par Hazelbark
dim. 24 mars 2024 15:03
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : minor army builder fix needed - large Prussian LW Infantry units are only 5 pts
Réponses : 6
Vues : 3949

Re: minor army builder fix needed - large Prussian LW Infantry units are only 5 pts

This is interesting. I always assumed the point cost on the troops table was what was multiplied by the large/small modifier. But you point out the special abilities comes after the size modifier. I not French Provisional line L2 B Sk1 are 8 points in list therefore a small is @ .75 would be 6. But ...
par Hazelbark
lun. 27 nov. 2023 18:47
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Impetuous Cavalry
Réponses : 4
Vues : 3782

Re: Impetuous Cavalry

Hi, that is the way we have played it, although it contradicts page 19, Impetuous cavalry is always compelled to pursue after a victorious shock. I would say a victorious shock is anything other than a melee result. To quote another. The Rule writing structure is broad principle first, with excepti...
par Hazelbark
lun. 27 nov. 2023 18:41
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Flank Opportunity charge question
Réponses : 4
Vues : 936

Re: Flank Opportunity charge question

So I see the resolution is a mis-translation and the 4 UD is the triggering range and once it is triggered it is a normal charge.

c'est bon
par Hazelbark
jeu. 23 nov. 2023 22:26
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Flank Opportunity charge question
Réponses : 4
Vues : 936

Re: Flank Opportunity charge question

If you flee, you are disordered, lose a cohesion, take an action marker and cannot move to within tactical of anyone.

You basically wish you could flee further
par Hazelbark
jeu. 23 nov. 2023 22:20
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Corps Reserve Artillery movement
Réponses : 4
Vues : 513

Re: Corps Reserve Artillery movement

RogerGreenwood a écrit :
lun. 20 nov. 2023 23:35
I agree with Dan. (If anyone cares 🙂).
i care
par Hazelbark
lun. 20 nov. 2023 00:46
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Opportunity charge on moving non-group
Réponses : 3
Vues : 487

Re: Opportunity charge on moving non-group

Agree they are separate moves. This would be exceedingly hard to coordinate which the intention of not group move. So yes the infantry getting too close to enemy mounted would trigger the Opportunity charge before the cavalry also moved.
par Hazelbark
lun. 20 nov. 2023 00:42
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Corps Reserve Artillery movement
Réponses : 4
Vues : 513

Re: Corps Reserve Artillery movement

The CP for the reserve artillery comes from the corps commander directly. I do not believe the unit follows any division orders. It is designed to be the corps artillery operating under the corps commander. If the intent was for it to operate with a division for the battle it would have been assigne...
par Hazelbark
dim. 12 nov. 2023 20:51
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : firefight morale test
Réponses : 9
Vues : 7797

Re: firefight morale test

RogerGreenwood a écrit :
sam. 16 sept. 2023 20:12
That's a good one. I suspect the reasoning in the rules should be applied. I.e. if the opponents are no longer there, there is no need for a test. Just my opinion though.
My view as well.
par Hazelbark
dim. 12 nov. 2023 20:48
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : V2 issues so far
Réponses : 9
Vues : 7004

Re: V2 issues so far

Lastly V1 correctly uses the term VOLLEY to refer to mass, simultaneous small arms fire, as opposed to skirmisher fire. So why change to the erroneous SALVO in V2. There is a long discussion document on the Internet that concludes that VOLLEY fire refers to mass, simultaneous small arms fire and SA...