128 résultats trouvés

par viperofmilan
lun. 4 janv. 2021 16:37
Forum : Army lists
Sujet : Ottoman Question
Réponses : 3
Vues : 8783

Ottoman Question

Ottoman national characteristics say that their infantry operate in deep order only. The only stated exemption to this are the Nizam-i-Jedid which can operate in deep or linear order. My question is this: what about the Sekhans? These are identified as type LT. I assume that this means they can brea...
par viperofmilan
jeu. 24 déc. 2020 14:35
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Unit visibility on gentle hills
Réponses : 7
Vues : 6359

Re: Unit visibility on gentle hills

Got it.
par viperofmilan
jeu. 17 déc. 2020 12:47
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Unit visibility on gentle hills
Réponses : 7
Vues : 6359

Re: Unit visibility on gentle hills

Sorry if I misunderstood, but I read your response to hedge the p. 20 line with provisos and conditions not mentioned on p. 20. An unseen unit that shoots reveals itself to all enemies. Period. That is what it says on p. 20. If it is seen, it can be fired on and/or charged. Yes?
par viperofmilan
jeu. 17 déc. 2020 02:46
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Unit visibility on gentle hills
Réponses : 7
Vues : 6359

Re: Unit visibility on gentle hills

You could be right Roger, but then again, the English rules say what they say on p. 20.
par viperofmilan
jeu. 17 déc. 2020 02:45
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Do disordered units still deduct movement cost
Réponses : 3
Vues : 3824

Re: Do disordered units still deduct movement cost

We've been moving them like unformed skirmisher units - 6 UD pretty mu in any direction.
par viperofmilan
mar. 15 déc. 2020 13:54
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Unit visibility on gentle hills
Réponses : 7
Vues : 6359

Unit visibility on gentle hills

I thought I understood this, but now I'm not sure. Please bear with me. p. 20 says "a unit cannot charge or fire at an enemy hidden in a wood or behind the crest of a hill" but that "a hidden unit that fires, however, reveals itself to all enemies". A couple questions about unclear points. 1. Really...
par viperofmilan
dim. 11 oct. 2020 20:49
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Fire support from friendly, non-activated division?
Réponses : 3
Vues : 4176

Re: Fire support from friendly, non-activated division?

Thanks to all for the quick responses.
par viperofmilan
sam. 10 oct. 2020 21:01
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Fire support from friendly, non-activated division?
Réponses : 3
Vues : 4176

Fire support from friendly, non-activated division?

Had a situation come up today which oddly hadn't come up before. Can a unit from a non-activated division in position to provide fire support to a unit or units from an activated division do so? If so, would it matter whether or not the unit from the non-activated division's division had been activa...
par viperofmilan
lun. 28 sept. 2020 01:13
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Artillery "under skirmisher fire"
Réponses : 4
Vues : 5157

Re: Artillery "under skirmisher fire"

Thanks. That is what I thought as well. My opponent thought only detached skirmishers should qualify, but he was not an disinterested commentator since we were in the middle of a game. :lol:
par viperofmilan
dim. 27 sept. 2020 00:10
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Artillery "under skirmisher fire"
Réponses : 4
Vues : 5157

Artillery "under skirmisher fire"

Do both detached skirmisher units and formed unit's integral skirmishers count as placing an unlimbered artillery unit "under skirmisher fire" for purposes of applying the -1 the the artillery's shooting?