Movingly Towards an Objective
-
RogerGreenwood
- Major
- Messages : 406
- Enregistré le : ven. 29 nov. 2019 20:55
Movingly Towards an Objective
Should 'moving towards an objective' mean moving towards your own side's objective and not include enemy objectives?
-
RogerGreenwood
- Major
- Messages : 406
- Enregistré le : ven. 29 nov. 2019 20:55
Re: Movingly Towards an Objective
On reflection, I am unsure about this. Perhaps it is more simple just to have objectives rather than each side having their own.
-
RogerGreenwood
- Major
- Messages : 406
- Enregistré le : ven. 29 nov. 2019 20:55
Re: Movingly Towards an Objective
Yes, it doesn't matter then who placed the objective marker.
-
Adrian Steer
- Capitaine
- Messages : 247
- Enregistré le : ven. 4 sept. 2020 20:17
Re: Movingly Towards an Objective
What if its an objective held by the enemy -I would guess this is allowed otherwise its a bit silly!
Based in the North of England UK, drop me a message if you're interested in playing a game of BE.
Re: Movingly Towards an Objective
You try to take objectives. So either neutral or occupied by enemy.
If you lose one of your own objectives, you can move toward it, since it's now occupied by enemy.
If you lose one of your own objectives, you can move toward it, since it's now occupied by enemy.